Temporal trends in revascularization strategy and outcomes in left main coronary artery stenosis: data from the ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization registry.

نویسندگان

  • Seung-Jung Park
  • Jung-Min Ahn
  • Young-Hak Kim
  • Duk-Woo Park
  • Sung-Cheol Yun
  • Sung-Han Yoon
  • Hyun Woo Park
  • Mineok Chang
  • Jong-Young Lee
  • Soo-Jin Kang
  • Seung-Whan Lee
  • Cheol Whan Lee
  • Seong-Wook Park
چکیده

BACKGROUND Changes over time in revascularization strategies and outcomes among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis remain largely unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 2618 consecutive patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis who underwent revascularization were identified from the ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization registry and classified by time periods: bare metal stent (wave 1, 1995-1998), early drug-eluting stents (wave 2, 2003-2006), and late drug-eluting stents (wave 3, 2007-2010). Primary end point was major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events (the composite of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke). During the study period, 1124 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 1494 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The proportion of PCI significantly increased from 35% to 52% between waves 1 and 3. In patients receiving PCI, the risk-adjusted incidence rate of major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events decreased from 20.18 cases per 100 person-years in wave 1 to 6.77 cases per 100 person-years in wave 3 (P<0.001 for trend). Death, the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization were also significantly decreased by 40%, 35%, and 46%, respectively. The risk-adjusted incidence rate of major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events did not change in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting. The difference major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events risk between PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting progressively reduced (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.33 [0.23-0.47]; 0.53 [0.35-0.80]; and 1.01 [0.68-1.49] from wave 1 to wave 3. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery PCI have significantly improved over time. In addition, more patients received PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in recent years.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Acute and Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Introduction : Significant left main coronary artery stenosis jeopardizes the entire myocardium of the left ventricle and has the worst prognosis of any form of coronary artery disease. Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered as the standard therapeutic approach for such patients. There are limited data on the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PC...

متن کامل

Comparison between Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris

Background and Purpose: Regarding usefulness of revascularization versus optimal medical therapy in patients with stable angina pectoris, data are challenging. The aim of this 12-month follow-up study was to compare the survival benefit associated with revascularization versus optimal medical therapy on the patients with stable angina pectoris. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical s...

متن کامل

Is surgery or percutaneous revascularization the preferred strategy for patients with significant left main coronary stenosis? Percutaneous Revascularization Is the Preferred Strategy for Patients With Significant Left Main Coronary Stenosis

In the early 1970s, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was found to improve late survival in comparison to medical therapy in patients with significant left main stenosis.1–3 Once CABG became the standard of care for left main disease, a distinction between “protected”—by at least 1 patent bypass graft to the left coronary artery—and “unprotected left main (UPLM)”— no patent bypass graft to th...

متن کامل

Impact of the extent of coronary artery disease on outcomes after revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to examine the impact of the extent of coronary disease on long-term outcomes after coronary stenting or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. BACKGROUND The differential outcome of ULMCA revascularization according to the coronary involvement remains uncertain. METHODS From the MAIN-COMPARE...

متن کامل

Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. BACKGROUND There have been few comparisons of long-term outcomes among currently available drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of LMCA disease. ME...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions

دوره 8 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015